HS2: Arguments For and Against the High-Speed Rail Lines

herpes simplex 2 Arguments For and Against the blue-Speed Rail LinesGeorgiana Raluca AndreiIntroductionWith the rapid result of the sparing and rapid expansion of technology, there is the need for a learning of infrastructure. herpes simplex 2 is a proposed infrastructure project to build a steep go sound off line from capital of the United Kingdom to Manchester and Leeds, via Birmingham, to begin operation in 2026 and be completed in 2032. It was seconded by the Labour organisation after 2009 and has had the support of the Conservative-Liberal Democrat Coalition G everywherenment since May 2010 (Butcher in Parliament, 2015).herpes simplex 2 forget be constructed in two separate phases contour 1 from London Euston to Birmingham Curzon Street and Lichfield with intermediate stations in westmost London (at old Oak Common) and at Birmingham airport degree 2 from the West Mid records, splitting into two legs an eastern leg to Leeds New driveway with intermediate stations in the East Midlands and South Yorkshire and a Hesperian leg to Manchester with intermediate stations at Crewe and Manchester Airport.In total, the scheme is estimated to price 42.6 billion for the infrastructure, with a further 7.5 billion for rolling stock. The information presented by Louise Butcher on (Parliament, 2015) offers a clear report about HS2 Phase 1 of the scheme. Supporters claim that construction of HS2 is urgently compulsory in order to deliver wider economic and regional benefits and to meet future tense demands. Opponents maintain that these demands are over stated and the same outcome nates be achieved with new(prenominal), cheaper means.Arguments for and against HS2 are based on competing ideas not nevertheless about what the country needs in terms of new or reformd rail infrastructure, but about how (if needed at all) it should be delivered and what the benefits and approachs are of the ideas put forward. The two sides fundamentally disagree with the othe rs interpretation of the facts and figures about the scheme.The case forThe government believes that creating a game-speed rail line between London and North of England will elevate numerous advantages to society.Travel mOne of the most grand benefits is the time saving. It is expected that once the project finished, it will make a residual in the time spent travelling. For example, Leeds to Birmingham is slashed from 1 hour 58 proceeding to just 57 minutes. The East Midlands hub at Toton is 19 minutes from Birmingham. Manchester to Birmingham to a greater extent than halves from 88 to 41 minutes (BBC newsworthiness Magazine, 2015). Also, it will improve productivity through savings to journey time.CrowdsCreating a high-speed rail line would provide less crowded acquires and make the journey more comfortable. This will protect the economy growth and the quality of life , and although cheaper measures superpower be easier ( such as upgrading existing lines), that would provi de a short fix and its not suitable for long-term.PunctualityThe government ask that the HS2 trains will stick more reliably to their timetables than the average train. ( BBC news, 2013). This is an important issue because the pasengers value being on time .Boosting UK economyCreating the HS2 will provide various ways to boost the economy, offering the aspect of a sustainable growth and allowing prosperity to expand beyond siemens east England, rebalancing UK economy. It will generate22,000 construction jobs in the next tail fin yearsand once the entire line is tiening do 100,000 jobs (BBC News Magazine, 2015). It will improve the access to employment, will make relocation of pipeline easier and will create opportunities for increased business, tourism and leasure activities. The wider economic benefits of a UK HSR net profit to wider West Midlands cities, towns and shire counties is expected to be 5.3 billion over 60 years, firearm the London to Birmingham route alone is e xpected to boost Birminghams economy by 1.23 billion, and towns and cities in surrounding counties by 2.5 billion (GO-HS2, 2015) .Good for the surroundHS2 will reduce dependency on air and car travel, this way decrease CO2 emissions. High speed trains are power by electricity, so their environmental performance will improve over time as more electricity comes from renewable sources. By reducing the time travel between cities in the nitrogen of England and Scotland, it will aid people to switch from air to rail. The construction of HS2 requires less land than building a new motorway. Also, it has the potential to stimulate further the current regeneration of Birmingham city centre and boost growth around Birmingham Airport and NEC.The case againstThe final bill wrong investment?The expected exist of HS2 from London to Manchester and Leeds was originally 33bn, in 2009 prices, but earlier this year, at the time of the High Speed Rail (Preparation) Bill debate, the cost leapt to 50bn, in 2011 prices. This excludes such things as localised infrastructure to connect with HS2, foot tie and farm bridges to cross it. In addition, this does not include the Heathrow yoke or any provision for changes to the scheme (Stop HS2, 2015). There are cheaper alternatives that would eat up the same effect as HS2 and will not cost as much, would be ready earlier and be better fit in meeting needs across the whole country.Demolition of homes and detriment to rural EnglandThe most affected area will be the north of Londons Euston station. More than half of the homes affected are in or around Camden. Across the entire line more than 600 homes will be bulldozed and another 340 homes will becut off from their wider neighbourhood. Homeowners will get the market place value of their property, irrefutable 10% and moving costs Infrastructure livelihood the line will be built on 250 acres of light-green belt land ( BBC News Magazine, 2015). HS2 threatens 350 unique habitats, 6 7 irreplaceable ancient woods, 30 river corridors, 24 Sites of Special Scientific Interest plus hundreds of other sensitive areas (Stop HS2, 2015). About 60 properties on the proposed phase 1 route are likely to experience levels of noise which will cast away for noise insulation under the Noise Insulation Regulations. The number of properties that whitethorn experience a noticeable increase in noise on the phase 1 route has been reduced since consultation by a third from 4,700 to around 3,100 ( BBC News Magazine, 2015).Increased coulomb copy emissionsOpponents claim that hardly a(prenominal) high-speed train passengers will transfer from air so the carbon emissions will not be reduced. Also, HS2 proposes to run trains at high speed which will need more energy than the existing Eurostar London-Paris trains force up electricity and carbon consumption. It will use three generation more energy than a normal inter-city train (HS2 Action Alliance, 2015). antic of creating new jobs Its been argued that HS2 will not actually create that many new jobs, most of them being associated with existing jobs within retail activity that have simply moved from other areas towards the new station. oer 70% of the jobs will be created in London, making London the rally city.HS2 will not benefit the ordinary traveller twist such an expensive train line would mean an increase in the train tickets. HS2 will only serve toincrease the price of train faresas train companies have to redistribute the costs associated with running on a line such as this (YouGov, 2015)ConclusionThe Government is proposing to provide the efficiency desperately needed across the UK through a new High Speed Rail Network. The new route will link London to Birmingham, then on to Manchester and Leeds forming what is known as the Y-Network. Eventually HSR trains will run to Newcastle, Glasgow and Edinburgh. Construction of such an important project brings together people who support the cause and people wh o dont. Both sides have important arguments to accommodate into consideration when deciding which side to take.It remains a hotly contested public issue because particular individuals, groups and industries believe they benefit from HS2 while others consider that they lose out.Reference listButcher , L. (2015) Railways HS2 Phase 1 Commons Library Standard Note online. Available at http//www.parliament.uk/business/publications/research/briefing-papers/SN00316/railways-hs2-phase-1 ( accessed first of present 2015).BBC News Magazine (2013) HS2 12 arguments for and against online. Available at http//www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-24159571 ( accessed 1st of March 2015 ).BBC News (2013) Quantifying the benefits of HS2 online. Available at http//www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22551178 ( accessed 1st of March 2015).GO-HS2 (2015) GO HS2 High speed rail online. Available at http//www.go-hs2.com/BenefitsOfHS2/EconomicImprovements.aspx ( accessed 1st of March 2015).Stop HS2 (2015) Stop HS2 online. Ava ilable at http//stophs2.org/facts ( accessed 1st of March 2015).HS2 Action Alliance (2015) Environment carbon journeys online. Available at http//www.hs2actionalliance.org/case-against-hs2/environment/carbon-journeys/ ( accessed 1st of March 2015).YouGov (2015) For and against High speed rail online. Available at https//yougov.co.uk/news/2012/01/20/for-against-high-speed-rail/ ( accessed 1st of March 2015).