Global Communication Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Global Communication Law - Essay ExampleIt is significant to note that the first amendment does not guard statements pronounced to insult, incite people to do an illegal action, or provoke violence. In addition, the U.S fair play prohibits utterance of words that aim to promote religious, racial or any kind of discrimination that world power lead to violence and hostility. It is against the law for a person to behave in a certain carriage otherwise in private if the behavior done due to national or race rootage of the other party. Such act that aims to insult, intimidate, offend, or injure other people is prohibited by the law. freedom of expression, speech, and right to privacy may be limited in cases where they pose a risk to prevalent safety, national security, and territorial integrity (Huffman & Trauth, 82).2. What constitutes obscenity differs in many nation-states when it comes to pornographic and obscene materials. Do you speak up that moral-religious censorship laws i n non-western societies and freedom of expression in western societies can co-exist in the global liquidation of today? Is there something in the foreign culture that can benefit or lead to service of our own system?According to the U.S constitution, obscenity is defined in reference to Miller v calcium case decided in 1973. Therefore, obscenity refers to a situation where the dress shows or explains, in a patently offensive manner, sexual conduct defined by law. Further, obscenity involves a situation where the work described lacks serious scientific, political, literary, or artistic value. U.S states treat pornographic materials as obscene because they contain sexually explicit materials that go against societal moral standards. It is rational to understand that Half of obscene materials available on the internet comes from outside the U.S and is thus prohibited by law (Huffman & Trauth, 99). The foreign cultures provide that no sexually explicit materials should be available o r accessible to the public because it contradicts