Reasons to Act Morally Essay -- Ethics Morals Philosophy

Why be chaste A Purpose to Life In our culture, many people ar asking the identical questions. What makes me better than you? Who regularises I have to treat you that direction? Why does America think it is better than any other province? All of these questions arise from the same question what be morals? This questions leads to another(prenominal) relevant question why be moral? What, if any subject, makes man (in this paper, I will use the word man in a generic sense meaning the entire human race) a moral creature and thus makes him responsible? However, is there any port we can really fill in that there are certain inherent laws which govern man, and goat these laws is there a Lawgiver that holds men accountable to these laws? I debate that all these questions can be answered through careful observation and ratiocinative thinking. Let us first look at the one thing we do for sure and that is man. We can know this for sure because we ar e men so we would know how we act. When we associate with others, we do so with some rules of legality in mind. We treat others in a certain way and predict them to treat us in the same way or we say it is unfair or selfish. We just wear the other person to know that such an act is wrong and that they must play by the same rules that we are. Why do we count this though? They did not grow up the same way you did. They were not raised by the same parents or even in the same household. So why should one expect them to know the same rules of fairness that you know. If the only basis for your assumption that they should know the rules is because you think the rules are right, then you have no reason to expect them to act that way. However, the other person does indeed know these rule... ...belong to us, we might as well be able to steal because there would be no reason not to. If there was no lawgiver there would be no law, but there obviously is this governing law in men t hat compels them to do certain things and not do others. If there were not consequences for these actions, anything would basically be moral right. If there was not a beingness behind the law to enforce it, there would be absolutely no real right or wrong. Everything would be relative, but it is not. There are things that everyone agrees are absolutely good, and absolutely bad. There is no other way around it. The lawgiver has given man a declare oneself and a reason for life, and it is mans moral obligation to fulfill that purpose by upholding the law given him.Works Cited / ConsultedLewis C.S. Mere Christianity. crude York, New York. Macmillan Publishing Company. 1943. pp 17-39.