Analysis: Narrative and Story Essay

The stylistic analysis of Richard Gordons tale Doctor in the house by Arailym Zharmukhamed from IN-11-2Doctor in the house was written by Richard Gordon, a famous English writer. He was born in 1921. He had been a surgeon and anaesthetist, he wrote many novels, screenplays for film and television and accounts of popular hi degree, more or lessly dealing with the practice of medicine. He was most famous for a long series of comic novels on a medical physical composition starting with Doctor in the syndicate, and the subsequent film, television, radio and stage adaptations. E realthing that beginning recognised in the bilgewater Doctor in the house was true to life, that is why it made this story so popular among people. The subject of the story is sitting for interrogatives.Well, now Im going to analyze the story. The story is short. And narrative mode of the school text are both narration and description. The antecedent describes us what question content for students and narrates about exam itself and his own experience when he was a student. The patch structure of the story is interesting one. The exposition of the text starts with the explanation what examination means for a medical student and what examination means in whole. After the explanation we come to the inciting mo custodyt when the vote counter takes his exam. I lento pass to the climax of the story when Richard is waiting for the results.And I come to the proclamation when he has learnt that passed the examinations. Having analyzed the plot structure, I would desire to give the epitome of the extract. The story takes place during the examination for medical students. As the narrator mentions its some(a)thing like a death. The exam is consists of two parts, they are written papers and oral examination. 3 hours are totallyowed for the paper. Students swott up the spot questions, because there is rarely any frank cheating in medical examinations. When the narrator is blameless with the written papers, he meets Grimsdyke who knows that theres a special remains of marking the tripos and the narrator shouldnt worry about it. As for the viva, it was a judgement twenty-four hour period, because a specious answer and the student is finished. There were 5 other students with the narrator who were going away the viva. When it was his turn to pass it he well copes with the first question, but stumbles through the second, that is why the days after the viva are black ones. At last the day when students could learn their results comes. Its the Secretary who simply should say pass or failed.The narrator worries so much that even doesnt hear theSecretary who named his number. So it cancelled out that the narrator passed his exam. His feelings are mixed. today, Im gradually passing to the main characters of the story. Here is only one main character the narrator. The method acting of character drawing is indirect. He is round, dynamic, protagonist character. T he narrator is a medical student. During the whole story we can see him passing through examinations. The day of the examination was the worst thing on the earth, something like death for all students. If you want to pass it you should be ready. So, I think he is well-educated in medicine, hard-working psyche, because there is rarely any frank cheating in medical examinations, so a student should know the material and facilitate himself. He managed with this. I as well as can say that he is very observant. The narrator notices different figure of emotions on peoples faces.For warning he talks about porters who get word dispassionately down at students, he sees an awkward expression of self-consciousness and superiority in students faces, he notices that the womans suit was neat but not smart, that her sensory hair tidy but not striking, that she wore enough make-up to look attractive. The narrator is an interesting character, he likes to compare people with somebody. For exa mples, he compares porters with policemen, examination is something like death as he mentions, the Old Stager with a photographer at a wedding. He can easily find the proper word to describe the person. So, I can say that he is smart. We also know he passed his exam, it means his knowledge of medicine are just enough and maybe one day hell become a doctor. On the whole, I can say that he creates an image of an run-of-the-mill student. I slowly come to the authors style of the text. If to look at the text, we may notice that it is written in the first person narration I walked down the stairs feeling as if I had just finished an eight-round fight,I was suggestn to a tiny waiting-room or I stood before table four. I didnt recognize the examiners. And so on. Speaking about vocabulary of the story, it is principal(prenominal) to say that the language is expressive, emotional.Richard Gordon uses dozens of thematic words such as student, cheating, the examiners, to pass, tripos the viva, written papers, and so forth The author uses stylistic devices and expressive means to achieve desired meat in describing characters and examination itself. Well, on the whole the text is emotionally moving. Now I want to provide some examples of Stylistic devices. Richard Gordon uses simile, metaphor, hyperbole, allusion,metonymy. By the simile examinations are something like death, the author shows what the students feel before it, their reason like a prize-fighter, here Richard Gordon wants to show the atmosphere of contest amidst the student himself and the examiner by using metaphor well-trodden paths the author shows the status to the medical textbooks frustrated brilliance about a gone look forward to of a student by using a hypebole an examination is vigor more than an investigation of a mans knowledge, the author shows what the examination is.Or But the viva is judgement day. A false answer, and the gods brow threatens like imminent thunderstorm to show the im portance of examination for students the author excellently uses the allusion referring to the Bibles conception day. We discover that final exams are death and the Secretary as an garden angelica corresponds where they would go to the paradise or to hell. So, we can see that the text is generative in stylistic devices, it makes it vivid. Its important to mention that the syntax of the story also helps to make the story vivid. Each sentence is complete. The structure of the sentences is characterized by a strict adherence to logic, the author uses parallels constructions which help to reflect the deform during anticipation of the narrators result The world stood still. The traffic stopped, the plants ceased growing, men were paralysed, the clouds hung in the air, the winds dropped, the tides disappeared, the sun halted in the sky.Having analyzed stylistic devises we can describe the atmosphere and tone of the story. In the beginning the atmosphere is strained, in the position of the test when students start examination it becomes nervous, but in the end its relaxed because the narrator has known that he passed the exam. The tone is serious because the narrator describes the examination and shows the importance of it for students. Having realized the story we can easily find the theme and the main humor of it. The theme of the story is worries about examination. The main idea is that examination is a real challenge for students and a real interrogatory of being ready for different difficulties. And now, Im trying to shut my thoughts. In our world, there are full of difficulties and various problems. Im sure no one can say that he is dispense with from spoiling his nerves and health in order to flog some important destiny barriers. As a matter of fact, who can mate that life is more interesting, when it flows as a calm river of constantly and monotonously changing events?A personbecomes experienced and strong only having felt the whole disgrace of the world he has a chance to peppy in. And what an amazing quality our memory has it specially chooses the worst recollections and with the sense rigor reminds us our past mistakes and annoyances, making us feel that awful feelings once again and again. The fact that nothing can be as memorable as our misfortunes was remarkably proved by Richard Gordon. Having a great medical practice, the author reveals his own recollections of the old days, when he was just a student, stumbling through the most scaring trial in his life the finals. He colourfully describes all the sides of his extremely important event. Cheating is practically impossible, all the knowledge is an inseparable mass in the heads of young and full of hopes students.Oral and writing examinations become some kind of a judgment day. And not everyone becomes that lucky, who will take the fleece from the professors hands. With an irony the author gives us the description of students feelings and behaviour. somewhat of th em fork up superiosity in their faces, others were trying to complete the last brilliant sentence, displease with the period allowed for them to express themselves. After years such event seems to be extremely funny. The author showed us the atmosphere people sometimes contain to be in. Recollecting my own experience I can say that in many cases my feelings were the same.Everything, which happens to us sooner or later turns into the simple recollection. Of communication channel it puts a trace in our mind, and not always pleasant one. write gives us a way to understanding of such things. It is humour, the outperform cure of the injures the life gives us. Remembering this rule a person is able to overcome many life trials, becoming stronger and wiser. In this case even the best professor cant be compared with the teacher we all have our past. For me, every time the examinations require from me much effort and nerves for expression and passing them. So, heaving read this stor y, I found that Richard Gordon is a overtake of witty descriptions of serious and important events in peoples life. not many authors are able to achieve this effect in his or her works, but Richard Gordon made this perfectly.