A Walk To Remember Compare Amp Contrast

Both involve a Story Of a boy and a girl, almost completely divers(prenominal) in their views, which soft f on the whole in revel n B arfoot, North Carolina. Through give away the celluloid the struggles of the characters are awfully similar to the struggles of the characters in the hold back, with a few changes here and there. Although the withstand and plastic film are similar, there are still releases between the two such as how the two got to know each other, how the characters are portrayed, as well as how certain sluicets occurred and how the characters reacted to them.The offset major difference between the novel and the film of A Walk to Remember is how different the characters are portrayed in each. For example, throughout the novel the leading girl, Jamie Sullivan, was the fainthearted daughter of the towns Pastor. She was unity of the kindest girls any unmatched had met, she would help anyone whether she was asked or not. She had a big leave in the towns orp hanage, and she had worshiped God more than anyone had seen. Jamie was an intelligent conservative girl who wore her ash-blonde hair put in a tight bun all the time.She wasnt known to acquire many friends, or pull down do normal adolescent things, and she usually spent her time at school, at the orphanage, or with her father. In comparison, in the ikon, Jamie was quite similar to these qualities she was smart, very ghostlike, shy, kind, and conservative showed by how she had dressed. However, even though Jamie was kind and seemed to be gentle, in the movie it didnt portray how religious she actually was as well as I thought they couldve. In addition, dont believe that it showed how much she actually cared for others and wished to help them.For example, Jamie would help younger kids and passenger car and do things like that, barely in the novel she also worked at an orphanage and would even elf little animals in the middle of the road, but in the movie you didnt truly see that side of Jamie as much. at once on the other hand, the main character, Logan Carter, is quite different in the movie than how he was described in the novel. F-or example, the very first place setting of the movie is Logan mashing a mean trick with his friends on a boy.In this scene you can already tell that Logan is supposed to be a tough boy and that h?s supposed to be trouble. In the novel Logan was nigh of a trouble assoilr when he was younger, which is possibly what gave the writers the idea to make him a bad boy in the movie. But in reality, Logan is secure your average confused teenage boy. He likes to hang out with his friends, go on dates, and didnt enjoy school all that much. Still, in the movie it portrays him as being careless and self centered until Jamie made him realize that he was making some bad choices.Another difference between the novel and the harbor of A Walk to Remember is how Jamie and Logan actually got to know each other. For example, in the novel the y first become a little closer aft(prenominal) Logan asks Jamie to the homecoming dance, provided because he needed a date and she was the only one aft. But in the movie, they both fill cast to do the annual town play, which does happen in the book but it wasnt their first encounter. As the story goes on Logan, as a punishment for his jape in the beginning of the movie, he must participate in the play which he ends up getting the lead role in.He starts to care a little more about the play as the movie progresses and he practices his lines more and more, and eventually asks Jamie to help him with his lines and she agrees to help but on one condition he has to promise not to fall in love with her. Now that line may be cute and seem not that important, but its an incredibly significant extract to the story in my opinion. This quote was used in the novel as well when London had asked Jamie to go to the homecoming dance with her, which I believe shows a little brilliance that the m ovie writers had kept such a specific quote.In addition to that, a considerable difference from the book to the movie would, in my opinion, be the accompaniment that in the novel they fell in love slowly and hung out at one anothers house, while in the movie they fell in love faster and did more romantic or public outings. Also Logan seemed to do more things to win her over in the book such as him visiting the orphanage with her and getting a great deal of specie without her knowledge so she could get the orphans Christmas presents, while in the movie they both seemed to just fall in love with each other.Lastly, certain events and reactions differed from the book to the movie. For instance, in the book Lagans friends would make free rein of and tease him for his attraction to Jamie and for outgo time and being friends with her. But they never would have dared make fun of Jamie to her face, mainly because they let like she was on Gods good side or had it in with God. Even if they had made fun of her to her face you could tell, just from what you have read that she wouldnt have done anything about it and she wouldnt have had a tax return for them.But on the contrary, in the movie Logan and his friends would make fun of her to her face and make fun her. Even though she was supposed to be Godly and kind, she still remained supra it all and even had some types of comebacks. For example, in one scene one Of Lagans friends had said If there is a higher power, why is it He cant get you a new sweater? And Jamie replies, Because Hes too busy looking for your psyche.The last difference between the book and the movie is that in the book when Logan found out about Jamie illness he felt disquieting and didnt know what to do. But on the other hand in the movie he seemed to be devoted to her and would do anything for her and he knew exactly what to do, even if he was in denial for a little bit aft(prenominal) he heard the news. To conclude, there are differences betw een the book and the movie, some may be minor some more noticeable, but boilers suit the book and the movie are Mathew similar to each other.